Advanced vRA Data Collection vRO Workflow

Data Collection in vRealize Automation is a process that keeps the vRA database in sync with endpoints such as vCenter Server. Most people reading this most likely already know how clunky this process is. Also, It’s not immediately obvious how this process can be automated from a vRO prospective. If you are performing any tasks against objects on your endpoints, such as day 2 actions that add or remove hard disks, networks, etc (and not using the OOTB reconfigure actions) then you almost certainly need to be able to programmatically invoke the data collection process to update all the information in vRA.

I have come across many different snippets of code that solved parts of the problem but were far from perfect and the code was ugly. I therefore decided to create something to make this process easy, whilst providing some additional quality of life features. So I present my Advanced Data Collection workflow for your pleasure.

Read More

Implementing Process Locks in vRO Workflows

I discovered last week that a developer wasn’t aware that you could use a locking semaphore in vRO. They were writing some API calls and encountered a 409 (conflict) error when a workflow was attempting to concurrently update the same resource (a load balancer if I recall but can’t remember the exact details). I felt that there may be other developers out there who are also not aware so I have created two workflows that can be used to create and remove process locks in your vRO workflows.

vRO provides an always available Locking System that can be used to create a lock for a given id and owner. It does this by creating a record in the embedded PostgreSQL database. When an attempt is made to create another record in the database, a key constraint occurs and the lock fails.

You should consider using a process lock if you are updating any resources that could cause a conflict or data consistency problems. Some examples include, updating a load balancer, updating a vRA Reservation, or preventing a data collection task from running because there is already one in progress. It is also useful to create a lock between sections of code in your workflow, which could cause a problem if the workflow was executed multiple times, simultaneously. Note, that you don’t always need to lock the entire workflow, just between areas of code where updates are performed. Read More

Resolve vRA/vCAC VM to vCenter VM

I wrote this post some time ago but I felt that it didn’t include some other use cases where you would want to resolve a vCenter virtual machine. I also previously used code that was provided by the vRO appliance that I wasn’t too keen on (logging was a bit light and there was code to search using the BIOS UUID, which we don’t care about). I have therefore updated this post to reflect the following use cases:

  • Find the vCenter VM by its instance Uuid when using the Event Broker;
  • Find the vCenter VM by its instance Uuid on a specific vCenter Server;
  • Find the vCenter VM by its name, on a specific vCenter Server and a specific folder;
  • Find the vCenter VM by its MoRef id on a specific vCenter Server;

Hopefully, there should be enough code provided here to help you achieve your goal no matter what your scenario. However, if you need something different, then feel free to contact me and I will try to help. Read More

vRA Developer: Part 3 – Performing CRUD Operations on IaaS Entity Objects

In a previous post vRA Developer: Part 1 – IaaS & Understanding The Entity Framework I detailed what the Entity Framework is and how objects and their properties could be discovered using an application called LINQPad.

This post is going to detail how we can interact with the IaaS servers and work with the objects within the Entity Framework. I have also written a number of actions that provide a standard interface to use when working with the entities and perform CRUD (Create, Read, Update, Delete) operations on them. 

Note: these actions are designed to be used with wrappers for your code (i.e. other actions performing a task, which call these actions) and not directly in your workflows (although there is no real harm if you want to, it’s just cleaner not to). Read More

vRA Developer: Part 2 – Dynamically Discover vCAC and vCACCAFE endpoints in vRO

When I work with endpoints in vRO, I like to use actions to discover these instead of hard coding them as attributes or within configuration elements. Hard coding of these endpoints requires manual configuration steps when moving code between environments, which is not ideal. I felt it would be a good idea to include this post early on within this series, as these hosts are often dependencies when working with a lot of my code.

All code that I have provided or talked about in this post can be downloaded as a vRO package for your consumption here.

Discover vRealize Automation Infrastructure (vCAC IaaS) Endpoint

You will generally only have a single vCAC IaaS endpoint in your vRO inventory. I have never worked in an environment where there was more than one. Therefore, the action I have created below requires no inputs and will attempt to discover this single vCAC IaaS endpoint. If you have more than one host for some reason then it should be fairly easy to incorporate this.

Log output:

Read More

vRealize Orchestrator: Standardised Logger Action


I have updated this page on 22nd Jan 2019 to introduce enhancements over the original logging action. I have converted the original function calls to an object based approach. This allows a logger object to be used, which looks cleaner and is initialised once. I have also introduced JSDoc documentation styles into my code.


One bugbear that I have with vRO is the limitation around system (console) logging. There is currently no way to dynamically output the name of an action or sub-workflow (see end of the post). I like to see exactly which action or workflow is executing code. This makes it easier for me to troubleshoot a defect, when I am looking at the output logs.

It is possible to use ‘workflow.name’ or ‘this.name’ inside an action, but this will always be set to the name of the initial workflow that was executed. This is because the workflow object is implicitly passed to the action that is called. The result, is that it will look like all the code is executing from the workflow (which is technically true, but I needed more granularity).

I therefore created a standardised way that workflow and action logging should be handled. This is achieved by using an action that will actually handle all the logging for me. The idea is, that an action or workflow will call the ‘logger‘ action, providing some parameters, that allow for a consistent and useful logging experience. Read More

vRealize Orchestrator: Standardising Modules & Actions


I have updated this page on 22nd Jan 2019 to introduce improvements over the original Action template and module structure. I have introduced the new logger object and JSDoc documentation styles into my code.


Managing your code base in vRealize Orchestrator can be quite challenging and complex. Often, you won’t realise this until you’ve reached a point where it becomes difficult and time consuming to both organise or locate existing code that you have written. In this post, I am going to suggest ways to help you organise your code better, using methods that I have adopted with my time using vRO.

I am not suggesting this be the perfect solution, but it should provide a working standard to adopt to your own needs. I would also argue that the extra time spent getting this in place on the outset, will lead to time saved later on.

Just for reference, from this point on, I am going to refer to ‘code base‘ and ‘actions‘ interchangeably, because your vRO actions ARE your code base. Almost every single line of code you write in vRO should be in an action (I will discuss this in more detail in a later post which I will link here).

Actions

Here are some general principles I like to follow when creating actions: As a general rule, actions should:

  • Contain small, manageable chunks of code that perform a specific task. Actions are just functions and just like any function, it should contain code that performs a specific task. If your action is doing many different tasks, then consider breaking these down into multiple, smaller actions.
  • Validate inputs. I appreciate that some may debate this idea, but actions are not ‘private functions’. They are public code where you can never guarantee that the action ‘caller’ is properly validating its inputs. This is the nature of vRO, it is a ‘hub’ that has many different uses cases and scenarios for executing the same actions. I have seen dozens of cases where developers and support engineers have wasted time tracking unexpected errors;
  • Be named appropriate to the task they perform. I generally like to use verbs in my action names, like, ‘getVirtualMachineNames’, ‘getVirtualMachineNetworks’ or ‘setCustomProperty’. Actions named this way will make it easier for other developers to identify what they are used for;
  • Have variables declared in a single block. This will just make it easier to see what variables are being used. The data type can also be defined, but is not always necessary or as important;
  • Provide consistent logging throughout. Make it so, the action almost tells the story of what is happening. Don’t go overboard, but generally a before, during and after style to logging works quite well;
  • Nesting actions within an action is generally ‘OK’ but keep it to a minimum if possible. Too many nested actions can create depth that may be more difficult to maintain and troubleshoot later on. Typical use cases are ‘helper’ or ‘utility’ actions (you’ll be completely forgiven with actions used for workflow presentation as these are a pain);
  • Perform singular tasks. Don’t write actions that perform plural tasks. Write the singular version first, then use a looping mechanism that re-uses the singular action (there are also ways this can be achieved with performance in mind in vRO). This way you’ll only have 1 version of the code;
  • Be based on a user-defined template. Yup, I’m not crazy. Have a defined template (aka boilerplate) set out on how an action should generally look and have the team follow this. It will make code reviews far easier;
  • Always use camel cased alphabetical characters (no dots);

Read More

Using the indexOf() method for Arrays and Strings for vRO and vRA

I’ve never been a developer so getting into JavaScript was quite a challenge at first and I probably always went the longest route possible to achieve something. As I use it more and more, I am picking up these neat little tricks and uses for built in methods that make my life easier.

In the world of vRA and vRO, I find that most of my time is spent iterating over arrays or parsing custom properties. One method that I have come to find extremely useful is the indexOf() that is available on Arrays and Strings. The methods are very similar but have very different use cases. Let’s take a look at each of them in turn.

String indexOf() Method

w3schools.com defines this as:

The indexOf() method returns the position of the first occurrence of a specified value in a string.

This method returns -1 if the value to search for never occurs.

So as an example, if we had the string “simplygeek.co.uk is fun”

string.indexOf(“m”) would return 2, which is the index within the string that ‘m’ first appears. Note that if ‘m’ appeared twice then only the first match would return a result. Indexes within arrays and strings always start at 0.

Another use case, one which I find the most useful, is being able to provide a string for the lookup. Take the following example:

string.indexOf(“simplygeek”) would return 0, because in a contiguous match the first index is returned.

When writing JavaScript that interacts with vRA you are often required to parse through custom properties, which are key value pairs of data. Such properties can contain useful information that relates to a deployment, such as virtual machine configuration. If custom properties follow a standardised naming convention, it can be easy to discover a set of properties. Let’s assume I have created the following custom properties in vRA for a deployment:

Custom.Deployment.Virtualmachine.Config.hotcpu : true
Custom.Deployment.Virtualmachine.Config.hotmem : true
Custom.Deployment.Virtualmachine.Config.sched.swap.vmxSwapEnabled : true

When the payload is sent to my vRO workflow it could contain over a 100 different key:value pairs of data. To find these easily I can use the indexOf method to iterate over each pair as follows:

The above will result in an array of properties related to virtual machine configs. I can then pass this array to some code that will handle the implementation of these advanced virtual machine settings. This allows for a very dynamic way to manage custom properties in property groups within vRA.

Array indexOf() method

Very similar to the String method, on an array, the indexOf() method returns the first index at which a given element can be found in the array, or -1 if it is not present. I find this method useful when I need to return a set of unique values from another array. let’s assume we have the following array:

myArray = [‘one’, ‘two’, ‘two’, ‘three’, ‘three’, ‘three’]

If I wanted to return only unique items from myArray, I could use the indexOf method as follows:

The above code will result in an array:

[‘one’, ‘two’, ‘three’]

I hope that someone else finds these as useful as I have. If you know of more use cases, then please let me know.